Current:Home > StocksBreyers to pay $8.85 million to settle 'natural vanilla' ice cream dispute -PureWealth Academy
Breyers to pay $8.85 million to settle 'natural vanilla' ice cream dispute
View
Date:2025-04-24 00:04:51
U.S. customers who have bought Breyers Natural Vanilla ice cream over the past eight years may be eligible for cash payment in a nearly $9 million settlement against the ice cream company.
The lawsuit applies to customers in the U.S. who bought the ice cream between April 21, 2016 and August 14, 2024, according to a news release from the Supreme Court of the State of New York in the Bronx.
An $8.85 million settlement has been reached in the class action lawsuit, which was filed against both Unilever United States, Inc., which owns Breyers, and Conopco, Inc., the New York-based advertiser Breyers works with, according to the lawsuit.
According to the court’s news release, the lawsuit alleges the ice cream was labeled "vanilla" as if its flavor came only from the vanilla plant when in reality, the product’s flavor contained non-vanilla plant flavors.
“The Defendants dispute all of these allegations and deny any wrongdoing,” the news release read. “The Court has not decided who is right.”
Still, Conopco, Inc. and Unilever United States, Inc. have agreed to create a settlement fund of $8,850,000.
How to get your cash settlement
According to the news release, customers may be eligible for a cash settlement if they bought Breyers Natural Vanilla ice cream in any size in the U.S. between April 21, 2016 and Aug. 14, 2024.
Cash settlements will be awarded to:
- Settlement class members who submit valid claim forms by Feb. 19, 2025.
- Valid claims with proof of purchase ($1 per product).
- Valid claims without proof or purchase ($1 per product with a maximum of eight products).
- Settlement class members who submit a valid claim for products with both proof of purchase and without proof of purchase (these customers will get combined cash payment benefits)
According to the companies, each household can only submit one single claim form.
The court has ruled that the companies must develop a new product formula that does not include vanilla derived from non-vanilla plant sources within 12 months of the settlement’s finalization, according to the news release.
Can I still sue the companies individually?
The court said in its news release that customers who want to exercise their right to sue have to “exclude” themselves from the settlement by completing an exclusion form found on the settlement website.
Customers can also mail or email a written request for exclusion by Oct. 31 to the claims administrator.
“If you choose to exclude yourself from the Settlement, you will not be bound by the Settlement or any judgment in this lawsuit,” the court said in its news release.
Customers can also object to the settlement by Oct. 31.
The court plans to hold a fairness hearing on Nov. 21 to determine whether or not the settlement is reasonable. The court will consider any objections.
Customers can attend the final approval hearing if they’d like but it’s not a requirement.
“Please do not call the Court or the Clerk of the Court for information about the Settlement,” the court wrote.
Forms can be found at www.vanillaicecreamsettlement.com/Home/Documents.
For more information, call 1-888-603-5137 and for a complete list of included products, visit www.VanillaIceCreamSettlement.com.
Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Follow her on Twitter at@SaleenMartin or email her atsdmartin@usatoday.com.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- A Plea to Make Widespread Environmental Damage an International Crime Takes Center Stage at The Hague
- What causes flash floods and why are they so dangerous?
- Britney Spears' memoir The Woman in Me gets release date
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Maya Rudolph is the new face of M&M's ad campaign
- Elon Musk takes the witness stand to defend his Tesla buyout tweets
- How Dying Forests and a Swedish Teenager Helped Revive Germany’s Clean Energy Revolution
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- Maryland, Virginia Lawmakers Spearhead Drive to Make the Chesapeake Bay a National Recreation Area
Ranking
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Everything Kourtney Kardashian Has Said About Wanting a Baby With Travis Barker
- Here's the latest on the NOTAM outage that caused flight delays and cancellations
- Looking for Amazon alternatives for ethical shopping? Here are some ideas
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Ticketmaster halts sales of tickets to Taylor Swift Eras Tour in France
- Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker Expecting First Baby Together: Look Back at Their Whirlwind Romance
- National Splurge Day: Shop 10 Ways To Treat Yourself on Any Budget
Recommendation
The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
House GOP chair accuses HHS of changing their story on NIH reappointments snafu
Planes Sampling Air Above the Amazon Find the Rainforest is Releasing More Carbon Than it Stores
The Essential Advocate, Philippe Sands Makes the Case for a New International Crime Called Ecocide
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Suspect arrested in Cleveland shooting that wounded 9
Inside Clean Energy: A California Utility Announces 770 Megawatts of Battery Storage. That’s a Lot.
Can China save its economy - and ours?