Current:Home > InvestProsecutors seek to bar Trump in classified files case from statements endangering law enforcement -PureWealth Academy
Prosecutors seek to bar Trump in classified files case from statements endangering law enforcement
View
Date:2025-04-13 01:34:16
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors on Friday asked the judge overseeing the classified documents case against Donald Trump to bar the former president from public statements that “pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents” participating in the prosecution.
The request to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon follows a false claim by Trump earlier this week that the FBI agents who searched his Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022 were “authorized to shoot me” and were “locked & loaded ready to take me out & put my family in danger.”
The presumptive Republican presidential nominee was referring to the disclosure in a court document that the FBI, during the search, followed a standard use-of-force policy that prohibits the use of deadly force except when the officer conducting the search has a reasonable belief that the “subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.”
The policy is routine and meant to limit the use of force during searches. Prosecutors noted that the search was intentionally conducted when Trump and his family were away and was coordinated with the Secret Service. No force was used.
Prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team said in court papers late Friday that Trump’s statements falsely suggesting that federal agents “were complicit in a plot to assassinate him” expose law enforcement — some of whom prosecutors noted will be called as witnesses at his trial — “to the risk of threats, violence, and harassment.”
“Trump’s repeated mischaracterization of these facts in widely distributed messages as an attempt to kill him, his family, and Secret Service agents has endangered law enforcement officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of this case and threatened the integrity of these proceedings,” prosecutors told Cannon, who was nominated to the bench by Trump.
“A restriction prohibiting future similar statements does not restrict legitimate speech,” they said.
Defense lawyers have objected to the government’s motion, prosecutors said. An attorney for Trump didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment Friday night.
Attorney General Merrick Garland earlier this week slammed Trump’s claim as “extremely dangerous.” Garland noted that the document Trump was referring to is a standard policy limiting the use of force that was even used in the consensual search of President Joe Biden’s home as part of an investigation into the Democrat’s handling of classified documents.
Trump faces dozens of felony counts accusing him of illegally hoarding at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, classified documents that he took with him after he left the White House in 2021, and then obstructing the FBI’s efforts to get them back. He has pleaded not guilty and denied wrongdoing.
It’s one of four criminal cases Trump is facing as he seeks to reclaim the White House, but outside of the ongoing New York hush money prosecution, it’s not clear that any of the other three will reach trial before the election.
Trump has already had restrictions placed on his speech in two of the other cases over incendiary comments officials say threaten the integrity of the prosecutions.
In the New York case, Trump has been fined and threatened with jail time for repeatedly violating a gag order that bars him from making public statements about witnesses, jurors and some others connected to the matter.
He’s also subject to a gag order in his federal criminal election interference case in Washington. That order limits what he can say about witnesses, lawyers in the case and court staff, though an appeals court freed him to speak about special counsel Smith, who brought the case.
_____
Associated Press reporter Alanna Durkin Richer contributed from Washington.
veryGood! (92294)
Related
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- North Carolina’s Bet on Biomass Energy Is Faltering, With Energy Targets Unmet and Concerns About Environmental Justice
- Cynthia Nixon Weighs In On Chances of Kim Cattrall Returning for More And Just Like That Episodes
- The dark side of the influencer industry
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- 'Let's Get It On' ... in court
- Where Are Interest Rates Going?
- Can forcing people to save cool inflation?
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Inside Clean Energy: Who’s Ahead in the Race for Offshore Wind Jobs in the US?
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Fox News settles blockbuster defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems
- How One Native American Tribe is Battling for Control Over Flaring
- Who Olivia Rodrigo Fans Think Her New Song Vampire Is Really About
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- YouTuber MrBeast Shares Major Fitness Transformation While Trying to Get “Yoked”
- New Study Says World Must Cut Short-Lived Climate Pollutants as Well as Carbon Dioxide to Meet Paris Agreement Goals
- Roy Wood Jr. wants laughs from White House Correspondents' speech — and reparations
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Rural grocery stores are dying. Here's how some small towns are trying to save them
A South Florida man shot at 2 Instacart delivery workers who went to the wrong house
Dollar v. world / Taylor Swift v. FTX / Fox v. Dominion
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Who bears the burden, and how much, when religious employees refuse Sabbath work?
The origins of the influencer industry
The path to Bed Bath & Beyond's downfall