Current:Home > ScamsFearless Fund drops grant program for Black women business owners in lawsuit settlement -PureWealth Academy
Fearless Fund drops grant program for Black women business owners in lawsuit settlement
View
Date:2025-04-16 07:26:29
NEW YORK (AP) — A venture capital firm has closed down a grant contest for Black women business owners as part of a settlement agreement with a conservative group that had filed a lawsuit alleging the program was discriminatory, both sides announced Wednesday.
The settlement came two months after a U.S. federal court of appeals panel ordered the Atlanta-Based Fearless Fund to suspend the Strivers Grant Contest, which provided $20,000 to businesses that are majority owned by Black women. In a 2-1 ruling, the appeals court ruled that the American Alliance for Equal Rights, led by conservative activist Ed Blum, was likely to prevail in its lawsuit claiming that the program illegally discriminated on the basis of race.
The lawsuit against the Fearless Fund, the Atlanta-based firm that has helped grow popular companies like beauty retailer Thirteen Lune and restaurant chain Slutty Vegan, has been closely watched as a bellwether in the growing legal battle waged by conservative groups against corporate diversity programs.
Bolstered by the Supreme Court case that ended affirmative action in college admissions, conservatives have targeted dozens of companies and government institutions and challenged a wide array of programs and policies bolstering diversity, equity and inclusion, known as DEI.
In a statement, Blum, who also brought the case that resulted in the affirmative action ruling, reiterated his view that “race-exclusive programs like the one the Fearless Fund promoted are divisive and illegal.”
In a statement, Arian Simone, CEO and co-founder of the Fearless Fund, said she was pleased to put the lawsuit behind her and continue with the firm’s mission of “helping and empowering women of color entrepreneurs in need.”
So far, none of the anti-DEI lawsuits have resulted in a precedent-setting ruling on the level of the Supreme Court decision on affirmative action. Ben Crump, a civil rights attorney who represented the Fearless Fund, said that the settlement ensured that lawsuit ended without setting any such precedent.
“By strategically avoiding a Supreme Court ruling that could have eliminated race-based funding, we protected vital opportunities for the entire Black and brown community,” Crump said in a statement.
Still, a growing number of companies — most recently including Lowe’s and John Deere — have altered or dropped DEI programs amid the onslaught of lawsuits and conservative activist pressure.
In statement, Blum said “it is to be hoped race-exclusive programs like the one offered by the Fearless Fund will be stopped and opened to everyone, regardless of their race.” Blum added that he had encouraged the Fearless Fund to open the Strivers Grant Contest to women of other races rather than shut it down. Other companies, including several law firms sued by Blum, have changed scholarships or fellowships to open it to all races.
Alphonso David, president and CEO of The Global Black Economic Forum and counsel to the Fearless Fund, shot back in an interview with The Associated Press that the “Fearless Fund was not going to allow Ed Blum to dictate how to run their business.” David said the Strivers Grant was a small part of the Fearless Fund’s operations and had already been scheduled to wind down. He said the settlement “is very narrow” and will not affect the venture capital’s firms investments or other activities.
The Strivers Grant Fund was one of several programs run by the foundation arm of the Fearless Fund, which was founded with backing from investors including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Mastercard, to address the wide racial disparity in funding for businesses owned by women of color. In her statement Wednesday, Simone announced a new $200 million debt fund that will offer loans of between $5,000 to $250,000 to “under-resourced founders.”
David Glasgow, executive director of the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging at New York University’s School of Law, said the decision to settle the lawsuit was not surprising because “the gamble you are making in cases like this is that if you continue fighting you will get more adverse rulings that have the potential to cause wider damage.”
“People are certainly seeing the writing on the wall on how the six-justice conservative super majority in the Supreme Court would rule in DEI-related cases,” Glasgow said.
The Fearless Fund case and other lawsuits have revealed deep divisions among the country’s judiciary on the issue of DEI.
Two judges, appointed by former President Donald Trump to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Miami, sided with Blum’s argument that the grant program violates section 1981 of the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race when enforcing contracts. The Reconstruction-era law was originally intended to protect formally enslaved people from economic exclusion, but anti-affirmative action activists have been leveraging it to challenge programs intended to benefit minority-owned businesses.
In sharp dissent, Judge Robin Rosenbaum, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said none of the anonymous plaintiffs represented by Blum demonstrated that they had any real intention to apply for the grants and likened their claims of harm to soccer players trying to win by “flopping on the field, faking an injury.”
_____
The Associated Press’ women in the workforce and state government coverage receives financial support from Pivotal Ventures. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Vanity Fair Oscars After-Party 2023 Red Carpet Fashion: See Every Look as the Stars Arrive
- Why Facebook and Instagram went down for hours on Monday
- U.S. sanctions Chinese suppliers of chemicals for fentanyl production
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Cara Delevingne Has Her Own Angelina Jolie Leg Moment in Elie Saab on Oscars 2023 Red Carpet
- The Push For Internet Voting Continues, Mostly Thanks To One Guy
- Ulta 24-Hour Flash Sale: Take 50% Off Ariana Grande's R.E.M. Beauty, Lancôme, Urban Decay, and More
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- We’re Stuck on Austin Butler and Kaia Gerber’s Oscars 2023 After-Party Date Night
Ranking
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Facebook whistleblower isn't protected from possible company retaliation, experts say
- Apple Issues Critical Patch To Fix Security Hole Exploited By Spyware Company
- Amazon warehouse workers on Staten Island push for union vote
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- There's an app to help prove vax status, but experts say choose wisely
- POV: Chris Olsen, Tinx and More Social Media Stars Take Over Oscars 2023
- The U.K. will save thousands of its iconic red phone kiosks from being shut down
Recommendation
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
Facebook Apologizes After Its AI Labels Black Men As 'Primates'
Instagram Is Pausing Its Plan To Develop A Platform For Kids After Criticism
Pregnant Rihanna Brings the Fashion Drama to the Oscars 2023 With Dominatrix Style
Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
Oscars 2023: Anne Heche, Charlbi Dean and More Left Out of In Memoriam Segment
U.S. sanctions Chinese suppliers of chemicals for fentanyl production
Adam Levine and Behati Prinsloo Pack on the PDA at Vanity Fair's 2023 Oscars After-Party